An appeal under s 352(5) of the WIM Act from consent orders made by an Arbitrator is limited to identifying error of fact, law or discretion; unsubstantiated allegations that a party did not understand or consent to the orders, without supporting evidence, do not establish an arguable error. The appropriate remedy for challenging consent orders on the basis of lack of consent is an application for reconsideration under s 350(3) before the Arbitrator, not an appeal to a Presidential member.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.