Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Shannon v Cassidy [2012] NTSC 27 — Criminal Law — Barrister AI

Shannon v Cassidy

[2012] NTSC 27

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Youth Justice Act - sentencing - defence appeal against restoration of a suspended sentence
3. › whether s 121(6) of the Youth Justice Act contains the power to restore a suspended sentence - appeal allowed.
1. Youth Justice Act (NT) s 4, s 6, s 69, s 81, s 83, s 98(2) and s 121(6); Sentencing Act (NT) s 43(5) and (7).
1. Ingram v Littman; Ingram v Verity (2009) NTSC 70, followed.

Case Details

Citation[2012] NTSC 27

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2016Campbell v The QueenNTSC 61
2015Fernando v Groves and Fernando v KassmanNTSC 81

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works