Indigenous Business Australia v Kani (No 2) [2012] NTSC 37 — Costs & Law Of Property Act S 86, 89, 105 — Barrister AI
← Back
Indigenous Business Australia v Kani (No 2)
[2012] NTSC 37
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+4 more
Procedure
›
Costs
›
Application by Plaintiff mortgagee for order for possession
›
Application by Defendant seeking relief against consequences of breach of mortgage
›
Order for possession refused on discretionary grounds
›
Order for relief made
›
Application by Plaintiff for costs
›
Contractual right to costs
›
Impact of the contractual right to costs on the Court’s discretion as to costs.
Law of Property Act s 86, 89, 105
Supreme Court Rules r 13.02, 63.03
Taree Pty Ltd v Bob Jane Corporation Pty Ltd & Anor [2008] VSC 228.
Case Details
Citation
[2012] NTSC 37
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
