← Back
Bell v McConnel & Anor
[2012] NTSC 66
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Legal Practitioners
›
COSTS
›
STATUTORY REVIEW
Legal Profession Act (NT)
›
Application for extension of time for review of legal costs assessment
›
general principles relating to extension of time applications
›
no merit in the application for review
›
no injustice to applicant if time limit enforced
›
application for extension of time refused
Legal Profession Act (NT) s 301, s 303, s 311, s 341, s 344, s 351, s 352, s 354
Gallo v Dawson [1990] HCA 30; (1990) 93 ALR 479, considered.
Case Details
Citation
[2012] NTSC 66
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
Bell v McConnel & Anor [2012] NTSC 66 — Costs & Legal Profession Act (NT) — Barrister AI