Bell v McConnel & Anor (No 2) [2012] NTSC 87 — Legal Profession Act (NT) — Barrister AI
← Back
Bell v McConnel & Anor (No 2)
[2012] NTSC 87
Supreme Court of the Northern Territory
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Costs
›
Legal Profession Act (NT)
›
unsuccessful application for extension of time for review of legal costs assessment
›
whether Supreme Court as “reviewer” has a discretion to award costs
›
whether a ‘civil proceeding’
›
Supreme Court Rules (NT) not applicable to review provisions
›
no costs discretion
›
no order as to parties’ costs
Supreme Court Rules (NT) r 1.02(1), r 63.03(1)
Legal Profession Act (NT) s 346, s 351, s 352, s 358, s 362
Case Details
Citation
[2012] NTSC 87
Court
NTSC
Jurisdiction
Northern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
