ASIT Investments Pty Ltd v Koerner & Ors

[2012] NTSC 89

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Tenancy Agreement
2. › FIXTURES OR CHATTELS
3. › Residential Tenancies Act (NT)
4. › Counterclaims for compensation and damages under s 122
5. › whether defendants’ improvements to caravan sites were fixtures or chattels
6. › principles relating to fixtures
7. › whether tenants of residential premises or tenants of vacant land
8. › defendants held not to occupy residential premises under tenancy agreements
9. › no entitlement to compensation and damages under s 122
1. Tenancy Agreement
2. › STATUTORY COMPENSATION
3. › Residential Tenancies Act (NT)
4. › whether defendant entitled to compensation under s 122(1)(a) for loss and damage suffered due to plaintiff’s alleged breach of term implied by s 48(1)(b)
5. › whether defendants’ losses caused by plaintiff’s breach
6. › defendants did not suffer loss or damage because of plaintiff’s failure to comply
7. › no entitlement to compensation and damages under s 122(1)(a)
1. Residential Tenancies Act (NT) s 4, s 6(h), s 47, s 48, s 49(1), s 57(1)(b), s 64(3), s 122
1. Fire and Emergency Regulations r 12

Citation[2012] NTSC 89

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in