Where an offender's psychiatric condition mildly impaired their capacity to understand the consequences of their offending, the sentencing court must demonstrably account for that condition in both the moral culpability assessment and the recognition that custody imposes a greater burden on persons with psychiatric issues. A failure to do so discernible from the sentencing remarks or sentence structure may render the sentence manifestly excessive. For fraud offences involving approximately $78,000 with breach of trust, no restitution, guilty pleas, no prior history, and mild psychiatric impairment, a head sentence of three years with parole after eight months was appropriate.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.