When assessing the reasonableness of a Nominal Defendant's compromise of a claim under s 60 of the Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994 (Qld), it is appropriate to consider the cumulative effect of the available evidence rather than examining each piece in isolation and dismissing weaker strands individually. Ownership and habitual use of a vehicle provides a reasonably strong basis for inferring the owner was the driver in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
The full text is available to signed-in members.