A sentence of 3.5 years imprisonment for maintaining an unlawful sexual relationship with a child was manifestly excessive where the offending involved no force, no touching under clothing, and no penetration, and was reduced to 2.5 years. A manifestly excessive concurrent sentence should be corrected even where it runs concurrently with a larger sentence, given potential parole ramifications. A trial judge may inform a jury about the availability of majority verdicts and the prescribed period before such verdicts may be accepted, without that constituting an improper request for a majority verdict.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.