Where identification evidence contains multiple discrepancies — including failure of eyewitnesses to identify the accused from photographs, CCTV footage contradicting a key witness's account, and inconsistencies in descriptions of the offender — a conviction based on that evidence may be unreasonable even where the jury had the advantage of comparing CCTV images with the accused in the dock.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.