Tasmania v B (No 2) [2012] TASSC 39 — Admissibility And Relevancy — Barrister AI
← Back
Tasmania v B (No 2)
[2012] TASSC 39
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Evidence
›
Admissibility and relevancy
›
Hearing
›
In general
›
Relevant principles
›
Exceptions to hearsay rule
›
Prior inconsistent statement
›
Previous representation by witness of admission by accused
›
Witness acknowledging making of representation but not its truth.
Evidence Act 2001 (Tas), s60(3).
Lee v R (1998) 195 CLR 594; R v AA (No 1) [2009] NSWSC 1414, distinguished.
Aust Dig Evidence [48]
Case Details
Citation
[2012] TASSC 39
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
