Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Rothery v Marr

[2012] TASSC 52

Supreme Court of Tasmania

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Human Rights
2. › Tribunals, commissions and other authorities
3. › Tasmania
4. › Anti-Discrimination Tribunal
5. › Complaint not alleging discrimination or prohibited conduct
6. › Dismissal as misconceived and lacking in substance.
1. Anti-Discrimination Act 1998 (Tas), s99(2)(a).
1. Aust Dig Human Rights [53]

Case Details

Citation[2012] TASSC 52

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2017Flanagan v Humana Pty LtdTASSC 50

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works

Rothery v Marr [2012] TASSC 52 — Human Rights & Aust Dig Human Rights [53] — Barrister AI