Snooks v CGU Insurance Limited [2012] TASSC 66 — Costs & Aust Dig Procedure [598] — Barrister AI
← Back
Snooks v CGU Insurance Limited
[2012] TASSC 66
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Procedure
›
Costs
›
Departing from the general rule
›
Other cases
›
Indulgence of court
›
Successful application to amend pleading
›
Exercise of discretion.
Supreme Court Civil Procedure Act 1932 (Tas), s12.
Stanley v Layne Christensen Company [2006] WASCA 56 referred to.
Aust Dig Procedure [598]
Case Details
Citation
[2012] TASSC 66
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
