← Back
French v McKenna (No 2)
[2012] TASSC 8
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Procedure
›
Costs
›
Departing from the general rule
›
Other cases
›
Indulgence of court
›
Successful application to set aside judgment
›
Ordinary principles
›
Exercise of discretion.
Supreme Court Civil Procedure Act 1932 (Tas), s12.
Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen [1984] FCA 176; (1984) 3 FCR 344 and Burgoine v Taylor (1878) 9 Ch D 1 referred to.
Aust Dig Procedure [598]
Case Details
Citation
[2012] TASSC 8
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
French v McKenna (No 2) [2012] TASSC 8 — Costs & Aust Dig Procedure [598] — Barrister AI