The case applies established principles governing the assessment of compensatory and aggravated damages in defamation, the scope of evidence admissible in mitigation of damages (particularly evidence of general bad reputation), and the circumstances in which qualified privilege is defeated by malice. The conduct of the defendant in the litigation, including the manner in which defences are pleaded and conducted, remains relevant to the assessment of aggravated damages.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 46 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 46 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.