Lashansky v Legal Practice Board of Western Australia [No 2]

[2012] WASCA 122

Western Australia Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Applications to reopen
3. › Interim application previously dismissed
4. › No change in circumstances
5. › Whether application to reopen should be granted
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Case management
3. › Filing of appellant's case
4. › Unless order
5. › Application to stay filing requirement
6. › Whether stay should be granted pending proposed High Court proceedings
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Apprehended bias
3. › Application for disqualification of judge
4. › Prior involvement with party in different capacity
5. › Whether disqualification warranted

Quick Take

An application to reopen a previously dismissed interim application will be refused where the applicant seeks only to re-tender irrelevant material and there has been no change in circumstances. An application to stay a filing order pending proposed proceedings in another court will be refused where the proposed proceedings have no bearing on the obligation to comply with the filing order.

Case Details

Citation[2012] WASCA 122

CourtWASCA

JurisdictionWestern Australia

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on3

2012Lashansky v Legal Practice Board of Western AustraliaWASCA 77
2011Lashansky v Legal Practice BoardWASCA 42
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in