The court construed the product recall exclusion (cl 3.17) as extending to the loss of value of recalled property, not merely the expenses of the recall process, and construed narrowly the Active Malfunctioning proviso in Endorsement 3.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 19 later cases that cite this judgment.
5 of the 19 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.