Repeated expressions of concluded disbelief during a hearing, combined with dismissive language and moralising, may give rise to apprehended bias even where the Tribunal invites post-hearing submissions, and the standard for assessing Tribunal conduct is not the same as for judges in adversarial proceedings.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 530 later cases that cite this judgment.
10 of the 530 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.