A broadly framed ground of appeal challenging the evidentiary basis for a damages calculation may encompass challenges to specific components of that calculation even if those components were not expressly identified in the ground. A statement by counsel that they do not wish to be heard further on a point is not necessarily an express abandonment or withdrawal of a submission on that point. Where a point was arguably not raised at first instance, prejudice to the opposing party may be cured by permitting the tender of additional evidence on the motion to vary.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.
5 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.