General and unspecific assertions of commercial prejudice from disclosure of contractual terms in published reasons are insufficient to satisfy the grounds for suppression under s 8 of the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW). The public interest in open justice requires specificity in the prejudice alleged before a suppression or redaction order will be made.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.