Abusive correspondence, deliberate obstruction of service of documents, and non-compliance with procedural rules can constitute special circumstances justifying security for costs under r 51.50 UCPR, even where the appellant is impecunious and the order will likely stifle the appeal. An adverse interlocutory ruling does not, without more, establish actual or apprehended bias.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 11 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 11 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.