Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Kalid Kaddour v R [2013] NSWCCA 243 — Criminal & Evidence Act S 128 — Barrister AI

Kalid Kaddour v R

[2013] NSWCCA 243

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › criminal
3. › interlocutory appeal
4. › nature of appeal
5. › Evidence Act s 128
6. › where accused objects to giving evidence
7. › where trial judge refused to grant certificate
8. › jurisdiction
9. › Criminal Appeal Act, s 5F(3)
10. › whether refusal of s 128 certificate an “interlocutory judgment or order given or made in proceedings”
1. Evidence
2. › Evidence Act s 128
3. › whether trial judge erroneously refused to grant s 128 certificate
4. › where accused makes tactical decision not to give evidence without certificate
5. › whether accused unfairly hindered in ability to satisfy onus to exclude prejudicial material pursuant to Evidence Act, s 137
6. › whether accused "objecting" to give evidence
7. › whether accused “compellable” to give evidence

Case Details

Citation[2013] NSWCCA 243

CourtNSWCCA

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on18

2012Michael v ReginaNSWCCA 164
2012Aytugrul v The QueenHCA 15
2010Song v YingNSWCA 237
2010Sasterawan v MorrisNSWCCA 91
and 14 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works