PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE:- judicial review proceedings — respondents' objection at trial that whether a claim that the applicants' conjunctive water use rights were ineffectually cancelled because of non-compliance with ss 116C and 117H of the Water Act 1912 and consequential judicial review grounds were not pleaded or properly particularised and that the Court should entertain them — applicants' objection at trial that discretionary defence that relief not be granted on ground that it would work disproportionate injustice to third parties was not pleaded and that the Court should not entertain it.
Case Details
Citation[2013] NSWLEC 42
CourtNSWLEC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
