Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Hancock & Anor v Rinehart & Ors [2013] NSWSC 1402 — [Privilege] — Barrister AI

Hancock & Anor v Rinehart & Ors

[2013] NSWSC 1402

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. [PRIVILEGE] — documents produced in answer to subpoena served on accountants who had provided accounting advice to trustee that included reference to legal advice — where issues include trustee's state of mind and specific beliefs at time of sending letter the subject of claims for trustee's removal — whether privilege waived

Case Details

Citation[2013] NSWSC 1402

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by3

2021Kayler‑Thomson v Colonial First State Investments Limited (No 2)FCA 854
2020Hancock v RinehartNSWSC 1853
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on13

2011Silkman, Dorise Enid v Shakespeare Haney Securities Limited (ACN 087 435 783) in its capacity as responsible entity of the Shakespeare Haney Premium Income Fund (ARSN 106 223 483)NSWSC 148
2009In the matter of Bevillesta Pty Limited (In Voluntary Administration)Application under Corporations Act: Martin John Green and Peter Paul Krejci as Voluntary Administrators of Bevillesta Pty Limited (ACN 008 428 162)NSWSC 417
2009Rollo Ventry Wakefield Gray v BNY Trust Company of Australia Limited (formerly Guardian Trust Australia Limited)NSWSC 789
2008Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v ArcherNSWCA 164
and 9 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works