CONTEMPT OF COURT — Undertaking provided to the Court to stay the execution of the Writ of Possession — Whether undertaking was uncertain, unclear and ambiguous — The proper construction, and subsequent effect, of an undertaking — The proper construction of a charge, or order, of contempt of Court — Whether Plaintiff must prove any state of mind or specific intent to disobey order of Court.
Case Details
Citation[2013] NSWSC 321
CourtNSWSC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 17 later cases that cite this judgment.
