Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Konneh v NSW (No.2) [2013] NSWSC 390 — Irregularity Of Pleadings — Barrister AI

Konneh v NSW (No.2)

[2013] NSWSC 390

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. PROCEDURE -notice of motion seeking to strike out paragraphs of amended statement of claim — irregularity of pleadings — whether two solicitors on record is contrary to the interests of justice. TORT -novel pleading of knowledge for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment.

Case Details

Citation[2013] NSWSC 390

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by7

2022Choi v Secretary, Department of Communities and JusticeNSWCA 170
2021Australia Pacific LNG Pty Limited & Ors v Sooner Insurance Company & OrsQSC 43
2019David William Pallas & Julie Ann Pallas as trustees for the Pallas Family Superannuation Fund v Lendlease Corporation Limited; Martin John Fletcher v Lendlease Corporation LimitedNSWSC 1631
2015Matthew Chaina v Graham Douglas Bates and each of the partners of Mallesons Stephen Jacques, as it was known at the relevant time, listed in the revised schedule A in the amended statement of claimNSWSC 1867
and 3 more after sign-in

Relies on10

2012Rahman v DubsNSWSC 1065
2011Elphick v Westfield Shopping Centre Management Company Pty LimitedNSWCA 356
2011Konneh v State of New South WalesNSWSC 1170
2010Spencer v Commonwealth of AustraliaHCA 28
and 6 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works