The Jones v Dunkel principle applies where a personal injury plaintiff's case depends on inference and hearsay and the plaintiff fails without explanation to call a spouse who could give direct evidence on the matters in issue. Three consequences flow from the Blatch v Archer principle: (1) an inference that the untendered evidence would not have helped the non-tendering party; (2) inferences against the non-tendering party may be more confidently drawn; and (3) inferences proposed by the non-tendering party may more readily be rejected.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.