Pseudolegal arguments challenging the constitutional validity of all Australian legislation since the Australia Act 1986 — including claims based on alleged procedural defects in the enactment process, the significance of courtroom coats of arms, and assertions of personal sovereignty — have been repeatedly and firmly rejected by Australian courts and provide no basis for judicial review or stay applications. Indemnity costs may be awarded against litigants who persist in advancing such hopeless arguments.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.