A powerful circumstantial case can sustain a murder conviction notwithstanding conflicting expert pathology evidence as to time of death and witness evidence of sightings of the deceased after the alleged time of death, where the expert evidence is qualified as to its reliability and the sighting witnesses' evidence is not persuasive. A redirection that reminds the jury of the beyond reasonable doubt standard and directs them to consider all relevant evidence (not just expert evidence) is not a misdirection.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.