Gomba Holdings (UK) Ltd v Minories Finance Ltd (No. 2),[2] Jamieson v Gosigil Pty Ltd,[3] and Citibank Savings Ltd v Nicholson.[4]
On the other hand, as mentioned earlier, given that the counterclaim was not without substance, at least to the extent that it was based on clear noncompliance with an important statutory provision, it is appropriate in lieu of the provisional orders made on 23 August 2013 to order that the plaintiff should have two-thirds of the costs of the proceedings to be agreed or taxed on a solicitor and own client basis, but that it should have one-third of its costs only on a party/party basis.
