A trial judge who has made findings as to the extent of a plaintiff's symptoms based on an assessment of the plaintiff's credibility and other supporting evidence may give effect to that assessment even where the judge has not unreservedly accepted the plaintiff's evidence, relying on the [name withheld] v [name withheld] rationale. The requirement of 'unreserved acceptance' stated in [name withheld] v Comcare is not an essential prerequisite in all cases.
The full text is available to signed-in members.