Ibrahim v Police

• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Procedure
  3. › Witnesses
  4. › Cross-examination
  5. › Rule in [name withheld] v [name withheld]
  6. › Whether failure to cross-examine on critical issue of genuineness of claimed lack of recollection resulted in procedural unfairness
  7. › Whether adverse credibility finding could stand absent cross-examination on the point
• 1. Evidence
  2. › Witnesses
  3. › Cross-examination
  4. › Rule in [name withheld] v [name withheld]
  5. › Obligation to put case to witness before making adverse credibility finding
  6. › Whether limited questions in cross-examination constituted sufficient challenge
• 1. Evidence
  2. › Witnesses
  3. › Corroboration
  4. › Whether Magistrate misunderstood corroborative evidence
  5. › Whether rejection of defendant's evidence could be sustained where corroborating witness acknowledged defendant's version could be correct
• 1. Criminal Law
  2. › Appeal
  3. › Appeal against conviction
  4. › Error by trial Magistrate in credibility findings
  5. › Joint trial on multiple counts
  6. › Whether flawed findings on one count impacted credit assessment on other count
  7. › Whether convictions should be set aside and retrial ordered

Quick Take