Attorney-General v Arkinstall [2013] TASCCA 12 — Procedure & Misuse Of Drugs Act 2001 (Tas), S12(2). — Barrister AI
← Back
Attorney-General v Arkinstall
[2013] TASCCA 12
Court of Criminal Appeal of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Criminal Law
›
Procedure
›
Summing-up
›
Drug trafficking
›
Reverse onus when accused in possession of trafficable quantity of drug
›
Evidence of possession of trafficable quantity emerging from evidence of accused
›
Whether discretion not to direct jury as to reverse onus provision because of unfairness.
Misuse of Drugs Act 2001 (Tas), s12(2).
King v R [1986] HCA 59; (1986) 161 CLR 423, distinguished.
Aust Dig Criminal Law [3162]
Case Details
Citation
[2013] TASCCA 12
Court
TASCCA
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2013] TASCCA 12
11 authorities it relies on
1936
1951
1966
1981
1996
2013
Relies on
11
2011
Waters v The Queen
VSCA 415
2008
Tasmania v Spence
TASSC 32
2006
Director of Public Prosecutions v Cook
TASSC 75
2000
R v G a E
VSCA 18
and 7 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
