Williams v Jack

[2013] TASSC 67

Supreme Court of Tasmania

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Procedure
2. › Inferior courts
3. › Tasmania
4. › Local courts
5. › Appeal and new trial
6. › Appeal to Supreme Court
7. › Generally
8. › Whether magistrate erred in law or fact
9. › Action for breach of contract
10. › Duties of magistrate in respect of unrepresented litigant
11. › Issue estoppel
12. › Whether breach causative of damage.
1. Building Act 2000 (Tas) ss33, 35, 40, 42, 43, 44(1)(c).
1. Evidence Act 2001 (Tas), s64(3).
1. March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 12; (1991) 171 CLR 506; Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd [No 2] [1967] 1 AC 853, applied.

Citation[2013] TASSC 67

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in