The test for leave to appeal interlocutory decisions in WA requires the appellant to show the decision is wrong or arguably attended with sufficient doubt, and that substantial injustice would result if leave were refused. Where the correctness of an interlocutory decision can be challenged on appeal from the final judgment, no substantial injustice arises. Special restraint applies to procedural decisions of case management judges.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
1 of the 1 citing case carries a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.