Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

McColley v Cth [2014] ACTCA 21 — Appeal And New Trial & Appeal — Barrister AI

McColley v Cth

[2014] ACTCA 21

ACT Court of Appeal

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal and New Trial
1. Appeal
1. General Principles
1. Whether trial judge denied procedural fairness by relying on authority not raised with parties PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Case Details

Citation[2014] ACTCA 21

CourtACTCA

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 21 later cases that cite this judgment.

4 of the 21 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by21

2026Qiu v Zhang (No 2)ACTSC 338
2026Kent Projects Pty Ltd v Communications Electrical Electronics Energy Information Postal Plumbing and Allied Services Union of AustraliaFCAFC 74
2025M Plus Advisers Pty Ltd v FrinoACTSC 517
2025Kent Projects Pty Ltd v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of AustraliaFCA 1221
and 17 more after sign-in

Relies on23

2012McColley v Commonwealth of AustraliaACTSC 154
2010Galovac Pty Limited v Australian Capital TerritoryACTSC 132
2009State of New South Wales v SpearpointNSWCA 233
2009Financial Integrity Group Limited v Farmer and Bravium Pty LimitedACTSC 143
and 19 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works