Senton v Steen

[2014] ACTSC 249

Supreme Court of the ACT26 September 2014

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Costs
2. › Calderbank offer by plaintiff before trial
3. › offer by plaintiff to settle for figure below award of damages by the court after reduction for contributory negligence
4. › no evidence of terms of retainer between plaintiff and plaintiff’s solicitors
5. › order for party-and-party costs up to date of expiry of Calderbank offer and solicitor-and-client costs after that date.
1. Parties:
1. Trevor Videan Senton by his litigation guardian the Public Advocate of the Australian Capital Territory (Plaintiff)
1. Francis James Steen (Defendant)

Citation[2014] ACTSC 249

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date26 September 2014

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in