Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Letten v Templeton (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 146 — Costs — Barrister AI

Letten v Templeton (No 2)

[2014] FCAFC 146

Full Court of the Federal Court

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Costs
3. › Apportionment of costs
4. › Partial success by respondents
5. › Whether discount appropriate where respondents failed on competency objection
6. › Whether 25% discount reasonably proportionate

Quick Take

A straightforward costs apportionment decision with no broader doctrinal significance.

Case Details

Citation[2014] FCAFC 146

CourtFCAFC

JurisdictionCommonwealth

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on1

2014Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 22)FCA 681

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works