Where an appellant succeeds on appeal on a point of statutory construction not argued at first instance, the usual order that the successful appellant recover costs of both the appeal and proceedings below will not be departed from where the new argument was broadly connected to arguments run below, no unnecessary costs were shown to have been incurred, and the hearing below would not have been shorter had the new point been raised. The mere fact that the appeal succeeded on a new point is not, without more, sufficient to justify departure from the usual costs order.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.