Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd v Tomlinson

[2014] NSWCA 237

NSW Court of Appeal

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Estoppel
2. › Issue estoppel
3. › Matters necessary to the decision
4. › Identity of issues
5. › Whether the issue of the respondent's employment by the appellant had been decided in the earlier proceedings
6. › Whether the concept of employment for award entitlements is the same as for workers' compensation legislation
1. Estoppel
2. › Issue estoppel
3. › Identity of parties
4. › Privity of interest
5. › Whether the Fair Work Ombudsman was the privy of the respondent employee in earlier proceedings
6. › Statutory enforcement proceedings on behalf of employees
7. › Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 680, 681, 682
1. Employment Law
2. › Relationship of employer and employee
3. › Whether the respondent was an employee of the appellant
4. › Whether that relationship was affected by a company inter-positioned between the appellant and respondent
5. › Labour hire arrangements
6. › Sham arrangements
1. Workers Compensation
2. › Proceedings for common law damages
3. › Preconditions to commencing proceedings
4. › Whether employee precluded from bringing action against employer
5. › Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), ss 151C, 151H, 151G
6. › Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW), ss 280A, 280B, 315, 318A

Quick Take

Where the Fair Work Ombudsman brings proceedings asserting an employee's entitlements against an employer, and the employee participates by providing evidence and declarations and orders are made for the employee's benefit, the Fair Work Ombudsman is the employee's privy in interest for issue estoppel purposes. A finding of employment in such proceedings will estop the employee from denying that employment relationship in subsequent proceedings. The concept of employment for the purposes of federal award entitlements is the same as for state workers' compensation legislation.