A worked example attached to a commercial contract 'for information purposes only' may confirm what can be derived from the text of the definition, but cannot safely be used to conclude that a scenario not depicted in the example falls outside the definition. Labels chosen by parties for defined terms are not arbitrary and may inform construction, notwithstanding the Shin Kobe Maru caution. Expressio unius arguments carry little weight in the construction of complex commercial definitions where the text and purpose of the provision point clearly in one direction.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 13 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 13 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.