A trial judge who rejects a plaintiff's account of an accident and finds the plaintiff not credible must still engage with the medical evidence from both parties that supports the existence of a psychiatric condition causally related to the accident. The finding that a plaintiff exaggerates symptoms does not relieve the judge of the obligation to consider whether the exaggeration is itself a product of a psychiatric condition (such as a conversion disorder or somatoform disorder) rather than conscious fabrication. Where conflicting medical reports are tendered without experts being called, counsel have an obligation to provide detailed submissions addressing how the conflicts should be resolved.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.