VALUATION OF LAND — objections to Valuer-General's valuations determined by Commissioners of the Court — further appeal on questions of law from decision of Commissioners — adjoining lands owned by the same person valued by Valuer-General as one under s 26 Valuation of Land Act 1916 and apportioned approximately 70% and 30% under s 28 (because different parts were situated in different local government areas) for 2007-2011 base dates — Commissioners found s 26 values for each year too high or too low and that the correct apportionment was approximately 60% and 40% — Commissioners upheld appeals re the land where 60% correct apportionment (instead of 70% incorrect apportionment) showed a lower value than Valuer-General's value — but Commissioners dismissed appeals and confirmed valuations re the other land where 40% correct apportionment (instead of 30% incorrect apportionment) showed a higher value, on basis that Court has no power to increase an apportioned value — whether error of law.
Case Details
Citation[2014] NSWLEC 186
CourtNSWLEC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
