Kazas-Rogaris v Gaddam (No. 2) [2014] NSWSC 1886 — Costs & Indemnity Costs — Barrister AI
← Back
Kazas-Rogaris v Gaddam (No. 2)
[2014] NSWSC 1886
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Costs
indemnity costs
Calderbank offer
no point of principle
Case Details
Citation
[2014] NSWSC 1886
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
