› required to comply with reporting obligations under s 13(2) of Child Protection (Offender Reporting and Registration) Act
› underwent psychological treatment
› risk of similar re-offending remained significant
› satisfied that offender posed a risk to the sexual safety of children in any community where he might reside, and children generally
Criminal Law
› Standard of proof
› inappropriate to attach a standard of satisfaction to the decision that a person poses a risk of the kind referred to in s 13(3) of Child Protection (Offender Reporting and Registration) Act
Criminal Law
› Standard of proof
› facts upon which court’s satisfaction for the purposes of a decision under s 13(3) of Child Protection (Offender Reporting and Registration) Act depends
› order is protective and preventative
› civil standard, balance of probabilities apply
Child Protection (Offender Reporting and Registration) Act (NT) s 11(1)(a), s 12(1)(a), s 13(1), s 13(2), s 13(3), s 13(4), s 14(5), s 14(6), s 16(1), s 37(2)(a), s38(6), s 72(1)
Case Details
Citation[2014] NTSC 11
CourtNTSC
JurisdictionNorthern Territory
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.