Theories Pty Ltd v Holt & Anor

[2014] NTSC 40

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Appeal
2. › Pleadings
3. › Local Court interlocutory decision
4. › Application for leave to appeal against refusal to grant leave to file Amended Particulars to Further Amended Notice of Defence
5. › Application to amend particulars made at conclusion of substantive hearing
6. › Prejudice to the first and second respondent
7. › Decision of Magistrate not attended with sufficient doubt
8. › Not in the interests of justice to grant leave
9. › Leave refused.
1. Local Court Rules 1998 (NT).
1. Supreme Court Rules 2013 (NT).
1. Angell v PNorth Consultants Pty Ltd [2007] NTCA 03; Banque Commeciale SA EN Liquidation v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279; Dare v Pulham [1982] HCA 70; (1982) 44 ALR 117; Leotta v Public Transport Commission (New South Wales) (1976) 9 ALR 437; Nationwide News Proprietary Limited (t/as) Centralian Advocate v Bradshaw (1986) 41 NTR1; Northern Territory of Australia and Anor v Roberts [2009] NTCA 05; Theories Pty Ltd v Holt and Anor [2012] NTSC 91, applied.

Citation[2014] NTSC 40

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in