The Queen v McNamara

[2014] NTSC 53

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › Evidence
3. › Admissibility
4. › Tendency evidence
5. › Sexual interest in children
6. › State of mind of accused
7. › Evidence not of “significant probative value”
8. › Evidence more prejudicial than probative
9. › No connection between evidence and relevant state of mind under Criminal Code (NT) and Criminal Code (Cth)
10. › Evidence not admitted.
1. Criminal Law
2. › Evidence
3. › Admissions
4. › Formal ruling unnecessary.
1. Criminal Law
2. › Evidence
3. › Form of evidence
4. › Evidence as written word
5. › Jury to read text rather than have text read aloud.
1. Child Care and Protection Act (NT), s 34.

Citation[2014] NTSC 53

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in