An applicant seeking an extension of time to appeal against conviction nearly six years after the event must provide an adequate explanation for the delay, supported by proper evidence. Unsubstantiated and unsworn allegations of duress in relation to guilty pleas, contradicted by the transcripts of the plea proceedings, are insufficient to demonstrate prospects of success or a miscarriage of justice. Where the applicant previously had the benefit of legal representation and abandoned the appeal against conviction, the absence of explanation for the subsequent delay is particularly significant.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.
7 of the 8 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.