R v Hardie

[2014] QCA 82

Queensland Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Appeal and new trial
3. › Procedure
4. › Notices of appeal
5. › Time for appeal and extension thereof
6. › Whether extension of time to appeal sentence should be granted
7. › Whether good reason for delay
8. › Whether in interests of justice
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Parole eligibility date
4. › Whether failure to set earlier parole eligibility date rendered sentences manifestly excessive
5. › Cumulative sentences
6. › Totality principle

Quick Take

Where an applicant for extension of time to appeal sentence cannot demonstrate that the sentences were manifestly excessive, the extension will be refused on the basis that it is not in the interests of justice, regardless of the adequacy of the explanation for delay.

Case Details

Citation[2014] QCA 82

CourtQCA

JurisdictionQueensland

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2019Reynolds v Commissioner of PoliceQDC 159

Relies on1

2011R v NormanQCA 267

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in