Norris v Pedder (No 2) [2014] TASSC 29 — Supreme Court Procedure — Barrister AI
← Back
Norris v Pedder (No 2)
[2014] TASSC 29
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Procedure
›
Supreme Court procedure
›
Tasmania
›
Practice under Rules of Court
›
Amendments
›
Defence
›
Amendments not obviously futile.
Supreme Court Rules 2000 (Tas), r427.
Horton v Jones (No 2) [1939] NSWStRp 35; (1939) 39 SR(NSW) 305; Commissioner for Railways v Bilewicz (1962) 80 WN(NSW) 790; Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [1995] FCA 1368; (1995) 58 FCR 26, followed.
Aust Dig Procedure [276]
Case Details
Citation
[2014] TASSC 29
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
